Saturday, 19 June 2010

ZAKIR NAIK - PREACHER OF HATE BANNED FROM UK

 
THERESA MAY BANS MUSLIM HATE PREACHER FROM BRITAIN

THERESA May was widely praised yesterday after banning an Islamic preacher dubbed a “truth-twister” by moderate Muslims from ­coming to Britain. The Home Secretary ordered the ban on Indian doctor turned TV preacher Zakir Naik, who reportedly said “every Muslim should be a terrorist”. It was Mrs May’s first major test of the Government’s pledge to be tough on extremism.

Last month it emerged that ­border officials had found no ­reason to bar the preacher, sparking calls for her to use her powers. Yesterday she announced: “I have today excluded Dr Naik from the UK. Numerous comments made by Dr Naik are evidence to me of his unacceptable behaviour. Coming to the UK is a privilege not a right and I am not willing to allow those who might not be conducive to the public good to enter the UK. Exclusion powers are very serious and no decision is taken lightly or as a method of stopping open debate on issues.”

Naik was due to give lectures in London and Sheffield next week. In the past he has said that Western women make themselves “more susceptible to rape” by wearing revealing clothing, has reportedly called for the execution of Muslims who change their faith and described Americans as pigs.

Tory MP and security expert Patrick Mercer said: “I don’t see why it took a change of Government for us to get tough on people who want to damage our society and kill our citizens. I warmly support the Home Secretary’s move and will accept no nonsense whatsoever from those who would attempt to defend this man.” Former Tory MP Paul Goodman wrote on the Conservative Home website that Mrs May had passed her first test “with flying colours”.


At long last, after thirteen years of pure Labour madness and hatred for the indigenous population of Britain, common sense finally prevails! We can be absolutely positive that Labour would have allowed this vile creature to walk right into the UK to incite his extremist violence against us - that's what Labour have always done and this quote from the above article proves that they would have done it yet again.....
 
"Last month it emerged that ­border officials had found no ­reason to bar the preacher"

..... these would be the same border officials installed by Labour to "watch over" our now infamous "porous borders", would it? The ones who are carrying on just the same as if Labour were still in power, would it? The same border officials who would have enforced useless Jackboots Jacqui Smith's fucking commie-biased ban on Michael Savage entering the UK, (even though he had no intention of coming), would it? The very same border agency that would prevent Geert Wilders from accepting an invitation from the House of Lords to screen his film in the very same House of Lords, would it?

FOR FUCK'S SAKE, you couldn't make these brainless twats up! 

The sooner this bunch of useless bureaucrats are thrown out on their overpaid, fat, stupid, Lefty arses and replaced by a proper integrated Border Force, as promised by David Cameron, a Border Force that actually works for Britain instead of communist Labour, the better for us all.


CUNTS!
Enhanced by Zemanta

27 comments:

  1. Quite right too, a totally sensible & realistic decision ..

    Let's hope that this is merely the first of many more such moves to protect us from those who would do us harm ..

    Next Mrs May needs to urgently address the problems being caused by the Anti-British hate-mongers, already here and who dare to insult our Troops ..

    I feel sure that her actions will receive a great deal of grass-roots support from "proper" British people everywhere ..

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm wondering if this won't more or less inspire sympathy for the man among moderate/extremist fence sitters.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think so too, CH - this stops the accursed Human Rights Act from kicking in once he's here - prevention is the best option at the moment. ;) :-P

    I'm afraid we are still stymied to fuck with the ones that are already here because of that damned HRA! >:o

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't believe that moderate Muslims will disagree with this decision, Girl X, but the radical extremists need no encouragement from us to start trouble and they will always use any excuse to do so. :)

    As the above article says....

    "<span>THERESA May was widely praised yesterday after banning an Islamic preacher dubbed a “truth-twister” by moderate Muslims from ­coming to Britain" </span> ;)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I've never bought into this idea that there are "moderates" to sit on fences in the first place ..

    If there are .. where are they ?

    Why aren't the so-called "moderates" out showing their feelings of "moderation" & condemning men such as Naik ?

    They're nowhere to be seen, because they don't exist ..

    Oh, yes .. some declare a pretence of "moderation" .. but only because it permits them to quietly play the "long-game" in the background & stay beneath the radar until a time of their choosing ..

    They want a foot in both "camps", waiting to see which way the wind will blow ..

    We already know what the extremists are capable of because they've demonstrated that in the recent past .. Therefore it behoves each & every one of us to be alert, vigilant and on our guard and to thwart them at every opportunity ..

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm just giving them the benefit of the doubt..... ish..... at the moment, CH, but you're right, of course, I don't actually trust one of them as far as I could throw them. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's good to see someone get tough somewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  8. “There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it.”'

    “The minarets are our bayonets, the domes our helmets, the mosques our barracks and the faithful our army.”

    Recep Tayyip Erdoğan - Prime Minister of Turkey.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Great post, Spidey!  I thought too, "Finally come common sense".  We need a women
    like her in USA, because we've just given away 1/2 of Arizona to mexico....these tards
    don't even try to secure borders.

    I hope the other twats still making crazy decisions get fired soon!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thats a wise stance, you can't trust all their "words". Actions are what count, and they
    should contine proper ones to get rid of psycho's & not let them come in the first place.

    BTW:  Thanks for the nice link on your sidebar, I see you've added some cool stuff
    to your right sidebar  :*

    ReplyDelete
  11. The difference between extremist/radical and moderate muslims, is that the extremists would slit your throat, while the moderates would explain why you deserved it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Finally a Home Secretary with a pair....Great Post Spidey...any chance of putting up a link....www.marchforengland.co.uk   fighting the cult of Islam for years....common sense and fair play for all, as long as you dont try to blow us up.....

    ReplyDelete
  13. Better yet .. round up all those who so vociferously hate Britain (our Security Services know who they are & where they live) .. If they're not UK Passport holders, deport them immediately .. with no right of appeal .. Yep, Gaza works for me ..

    If they are UK Passport holders, conscript them & draft then to the "Stan" as human IED detectors .. I'm sure they won't complain .. surely there can be nothing more holy and devout than being sent to meet the 72 virgins by one of your own moose-limb brothers ..

    ReplyDelete
  14.  Now we just have to get those already here on the slow boat and we might be getting somewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Have to agree to disagree on this one Spider. As with Mr Wilders, let him come and speak, now under the glare of publicity, let's hear the reaction of his supporters and see what the 'moderate moslems' think, say and do about it.
    Let's see which state supported moslem community centres condem him for his hate and which stay silent.

    ReplyDelete
  16. That's okay, Banned, although it's been so biased in favour of the hate preachers for the last thirteen years that I'm really glad to see the shoe on the other foot for a change. If Labour were going to issue banning orders they should have done it fairly and banned both sides. *DONT_KNOW*

    I think, (the same as you do, most likely), that we'll have a lot of "moderate" silence on this with the usual extremists making the most noise. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  17. That will be the tricky part, James - because of the EHCR and that bloody Human Rights Act! >:o

    ReplyDelete
  18. Thanks, MR SAS, and no problem with the link - http://<span>www.marchforengland.co.uk  </span> ;) <span></span>

    ReplyDelete
  19. I really wish we could, Christopher, but thanks to Tony B.Liar, we've been signed up to every single aspect of the Human Rights Act, (his "proudest achievement"), and we have been sold so far down the river by both Bliar and Brownfinger to the EU that we are no longer able to deport these cunts - the European Court of Human Rights, which now has full control over these matters, won't allow it! >:o >:o >:o >:o

    ReplyDelete
  20. Now that is a fucking good plan, CH, I like it! :-P :-P :-D :-D

    ReplyDelete
  21. Love that cat, btw..... saved! ;)

    ReplyDelete
  22. Very good point, Oz, I'll certainly remember that one. ;) ;)

    ReplyDelete
  23. Thanks for that, Scunnert, I've saved the quote, mate! ;)

    ReplyDelete
  24. My pleasure, Bunni, I've been meaning to do that for some time. :)

    ReplyDelete
  25. I just found this on my Blogger comments.....

    <span>Woodsterman (Odie) said...</span>

    It's good to see someone get tough somewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  26. You're not kidding, Odie, we've been waiting for a long time over here! ;)

    ReplyDelete