And here's a reminder that not only do these machines irradiate you well beyond safe limits, they also do this........
Which can be fully processed to produce this......
Still willing to go through one of these things?
THE SECOND WORD IS "OFF"!
***************
+++UPDATE+++
MORE HERE
***************
+++UPDATE+++
I really hate to be duped when I use pictures from a website that I trust to get it right - but that usually means that they were duped, too. The people who originate the fakes on purpose are the real problem and they should be ashamed of themselves. I always try to be absolutely fair, so here are the original source pictures........
MORE HERE
I don't know where Alex gets his energy from...he is amazing and so on the money, everyone should know what he has to say!
ReplyDeleteBS,
ReplyDeleteI am happy to report that I caused a bit of a fuss at Schiphol on Tuesday morning.
I went to the gate (D6) to clear security for my Aberdeen flight. As I handed the wifey my boarding card I saw people merrily leaping into the full body scanner. I said, "I'm not going in that thing. Is there an option of a pat down?". She said, "Ask the security guy".
I walked over and he, a strapping bloke of around 6' 8", said "Just step into the scanner please".
"No", says I.
"Erm, what?", says he.
"I am not going in there. They aren't safe. And they violate my privacy. What are my options?".
"They are perfectly safe", he says, "They use sound waves. This does not use back-scatter technology".
"I don't care what it uses. I am am not going in".
"Okay", he says, still being pretty friendly, "Come through the normal one and I will pat you down".
I go through, no alarms go off, and he pats me down. Gives me the all clear and shows me how this "new" scanner works as someone comes through. "It's harmless" he opines.
I said I would research the machine, made by L3.
Meanwhile, about seven people were now lining up to come through the old style x-ray jobbie. "No, no" says the big guy, "You must use the scanner".
Like meek little lambs the queue shifts to come through the full body thing.
Stood my ground and got what I wanted. I was prepared for the worst, which would have been to wait four hours for the next flight and hope that it was at a gate that didn't use these invasive machines. If not, I would have waited longer.
CR.
Hello Captain, welcome back from Africa! Admirable stance of yours re: the scanner at Schiphol. However, Manchester airport isn't as easygoing. If you look on their website you will see that anyone who refuses to be scanned will NOT have the option of a pat-down search and will be denied travel!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.manchesterairport.co.uk/manweb.nsf/Content/X-Ray-Scanners-Public-Information
I was meant to fly to and from Manchester Airport on a work-related trip but after I spotted their scanner policy on their web-page, I refused point-blank to go. A pat-down search is undignified enough, but these scanners are a hundred miles over the line of human dignity.
Thanks Richard. It's good to be home.
ReplyDeleteI followed your link, then I searched the statute database and I have now started a bigger post about this subject. I'll publish it tomorrow. You get a mention, as does Spidey.
CR.
Just to let you know I ejaculated my scanner post early.
ReplyDeleteIt's up now if you want to see the full thing.
CR.
Good stuff, CR, I'll be over to read it, mate. ;)
ReplyDelete"Sound waves" - that operative is either, thick and trusting and implicitly believes what his employers have told him or he's lying through his teeth, CR. =-O
ReplyDeleteMore people need to refuse to go through the bloody things and be refused flights before the airlines notice they are losing money - that's the only thing that will force the government to get rid of them. ;)
I already wouldn't use the things for the same reason you've given but now the truth about the radiation levels ought to knock the final nail into their coffin if only enough sheeple will finally wake up and flatly refuse to use them.
ReplyDeleteThat's why the Lefty powers that be keep trying to portray him as a raving loony, Indy - as soon as they start doing that, they confirm that they are scared because you're telling the truth. ;)
ReplyDeletelooks fake to me. the gun is going across her butt in the scan but in the picture she has tight jeans on going up her butt. This leaves no room for the gun. this photo and scan are not true to each other.
ReplyDeleteThese images are fake:
ReplyDeletehttp://justgetthere.us/blog/archives/DISINFORMATION-Inverted-Body-Scanner-Image-Shows-Naked-Body-In-Full-Living-Color.html
<p>Thanks, folks - the picture below is taken using <span>hi-res backscatter x-rays</span> and this is the technology being used in airports right now. I know that you've been shown some very grainy badly defined images but again, this is what they are really doing and why the radiation levels are so high. They are also saving all of the scans..... which they assured everyone they would <span>not</span> be doing.
ReplyDelete</p>
These images are really really fake. I reversed the image as this article says, and it looks nothing like the result they show.
ReplyDeleteThe image in the comment below is not fake and I think it's safe to say it leaves nothing to the imagination.
ReplyDeleteI have now seen the original source pictures of this woman and you're absolutely right, these are fake but I wasn't aware of that when I first posted them. However, <span>The images in the comment below is not fake and I think it's safe to say they leave nothing to the imagination.</span>
ReplyDelete<span>I have now seen the original source pictures of this woman and you're absolutely correct, these are fake but I wasn't aware of that when I first posted them here. However, <span>The images in the comment below are not fake and I think it's safe to say they leave nothing to the imagination.</span></span>
ReplyDeleteThanks, Doc. :)
ReplyDeleteThanks, Mark and Sunshine. :)
ReplyDeleteThanks again, Mark. ;)
ReplyDeleteThanks for the info, Guest.
ReplyDeleteI don't see what the big deal is, I would prefer someone see my junk than be blown up in midair. I think we have gotten way to sensitive about our "private parts", everyone has them and there is nothing very special about yours. I have no problem with the human form, and remember If you don't want to do what is necessary for yours and everyone else's safety you have options: stay home, drive, take a train, walk, ride the bus.
ReplyDeleteThe thing is, Guest, these searches are not for your protection, they are about showing you who's boss and subjecting people to total government control, (aka: New World Order/One World Government/World "Governance"/UN Agenda 21). The Israelies have had no terrorist incidents for years because they use proper profiling/behaviour analysis techniques instead of penalising absolutely everyone with moronic political correctness and tyranny.
ReplyDeleteGuest is probably paid by the Neo Conservatives to post their ridiculous rhetoric. Just recently I was violated by TSA. This has to stop!
ReplyDelete"<span>these searches are not for your protection, they are about showing you who's boss and subjecting people to total government control, (aka: New World Order/One World Government/World "Governance"/UN Agenda 21)."</span>
ReplyDeleteNote your own last: Agenda 21. If that backscatter photo was right, EVERYONE'S "junk" who has gone through one of those even once is FRID> GMOs, cause sterilty; so do vaccines; so do a number of other things about which they're trying to take choice away from us. It's alal much farther along than most have any idea of. They may have all but succeeded by now.
Ian
I completely agree, Ian, and they're accelerating the process, too, probably because a lot of people are waking up to their stinking, totalitarian intentions. >:o
ReplyDelete